Decision-making transparency also suffered in the 2024 spring session. In the rush to vote on draft normative acts, the deputies forgot, in some places, about this important aspect of their activity. Among the 20 plenary meetings in which the deputies met, there was not a single meeting in which the decision-making transparency was not affected by the non-publication of the documents related to the projects or by the fact that the deadline for presenting the recommendations of the interested parties on the projects was not respected. The findings were made by the Promo-LEX Association, which stated numerous times that the documents related to draft normative acts must be published in sufficient time before the Parliament sessions, to ensure their transparency and accessibility, informs TRIBUNA.

According to experts, in the spring session, in total, the degree of transparency was affected by 58%, with values ​​between 31% and even 100%.

Among the 20 meetings, in the case of 13 meetings, the degree of compliance with decision-making transparency was affected by more than 50%. Compared to the fall parliamentary session, the degree of damage to decision-making transparency averaged 49%, with values ​​ranging between 18% and 100%.

During the spring parliamentary session, there were meetings in which the degree of damage to decision-making transparency recorded high values, such as:

the meeting of March 28 – decision-making transparency was affected by 81%;
the meeting of March 21 – decision-making transparency was affected by 65%;
the meeting of May 16 – decision-making transparency was affected by 60%;
the meeting of June 6 – decision-making transparency was affected in proportion to 100%;
the July 11 meeting – decision-making transparency was affected by 74%.